Football: Winners & Losers Of The January Transfer Window

0

 

With the window now closed, Goal.com looks back at the best and worst bits of business done over the past month.

#1 Winner: Arsenal

 

As Tuesday night’s dismal loss at Swansea so painfully underlined,
Arsenal still have major issues to address in defence, and particularly
in between the posts. Indeed, it is worth noting that no goalkeeper
across Europe’s Big Five leagues has made more mistakes leading to goals
(4) than Petr Cech.

 

However, the January transfer window has gone better than even the most optimistic Arsenal fan could have envisaged.

 

The Gunners began the month faced with the prospect of losing their
two best players, Alexis Sanchez and Mesut Ozil, on free transfers this
summer. 

 

 

Sanchez has since defected to Manchester United but that is a
positive given how negative an influence he had become on the Arsenal
dressing room. 

 

Furthermore, the Gunners have acquired a potentially excellent
player in return, Henrikh Mkhitaryan, who should flourish under a coach
who affords his attackers greater freedom, particularly as he will be
playing alongside his old pal from Borussia Dortmund, Pierre-Emerick
Aubameyang.

 

Ozil’s surprising but most welcome decision to extend his contract
was also clearly influenced by the appetising prospect of providing
passes for the Thierry Henry-like Gabon striker.

 

Of course, the £56 million paid to BVB for Aubameyang’s services
constitutes a club-record fee for the Gunners but when one considers
that it was partly funded by the removal of some dead wood (Theo Walcott
and Francis Coquelin, for a combined £37m), then it is impossible to
view Arsene Wenger’s winter window wheeling and dealing as anything
other than a success.

 

Will Arsenal finish in the top four? That remains to be seen. But have they now a better chance of doing so? Absolutely.

 

Jose Mourinho

 

#2 Winner: Jose Mourinho

 

Given the way in which Jose Mourinho embraces excuses and
fabricates facts, it’s rare to find oneself in agreement with the master
manipulator of the media. 

 

However, the Manchester United boss had a point when he claimed
that exchanging the unwanted Henrikh Mkhitaryan for the in-demand Alexis
Sanchez was a masterstroke. 

 

“He was cheap, wasn’t he?” Mourinho enthused. “Free transfer! He was free. So, for that price, he’s fantastic. 

“I think everybody thinks the same. Everyone has to agree that he is a fantastic player and the team that got him has a plus.”

 

No arguments here. Alexis will add a whole new dimension to a
forward line that often seemed bereft of creativity against the very
best sides. 

 

That the versatile Chilean attacker was all set to join Mourinho’s
nemesis, Pep Guardiola, at Manchester City before United hijacked the
transfer only made this particular “orange” taste all the sweeter for
the preening Portuguese.

 

 

#3 Winner: Barcelona

 

It was only last August that Barcelona defender Gerard Pique mournfully admitted, “In the nine years that I have been here, this is the first time that I feel inferior to Madrid.”

 

Luckily for the proud Catalan, that depressing sensation did not
last long. During the first half of the season, the Blaugrana reasserted
themselves as the best team in La Liga, even routing a ragged Real side
at the Santiago Bernabeu just before Christmas. 

 

Consequently, if anyone needed a big signing during the winter
window, it was los Blancos – and yet whereas there wasn’t a single new
arrival in the Spanish capital in January, Barcelona have been the
winter window’s biggest spenders. 

 

The Blaugrana spent a combined total of €131.8m on Philippe
Coutinho and Yerry Mina, boosting Ernesto Valverde’s hopes of emulating
predecessors Pep Guardiola and Luis Enrique by winning a treble in his
first season in charge.

 

The aerially-dominant, all-dancing centre-half Mina should prove an
absolute steal at €11.8m and while Coutinho’s mid-season arrival for a
whopping €120m (which could rise to €160m depending on add-ons) is
peculiarly timed, particularly as the Brazilian is cup-tied in the
Champions League, runaway Liga leaders Barca are now in a position to
rest the likes of Andres Iniesta on a regular basis.  

 

In addition, Barca have managed to remove a couple of high earners
from their wage bill, Javier Mascherano and Arda Turan, while at the
same time sending Rafinha and Gerard Deulofeu out on loan.

 

Madrid, by complete contrast, are now preparing for a must-win
Champions League last-16 showdown with Paris Saint-Germain with the same
core of group of players that have looked so jaded in recent months.

 

In short, Pique is feeling superior again…

 

Jurgen Klopp

 

#4 Loser: Liverpool

 

“Liverpool is not a club that has to sell players,” manager Jurgen Klopp declared last summer, after Barcelona upped their bid for Philippe Coutinho. “That is set in stone, so what they offer in the end doesn’t matter.”

 

Why, then, did Liverpool agree to sell the Brazilian to the
Blaugrana in January, at a time when the Reds are locked in a battle
with Manchester United, Chelsea, Tottenham and arguably Arsenal for
three of the Premier League’s remaining top-four berths, as well as
looking forward to a winnable Champions League last-16 tie with Porto?

 

The money on offer (€120m, and a potential €40m in add-ons) was
colossal, particularly when one considers Coutinho could hardly be
considered one of the top five players in the world, but would it really
have been much less at the end of the season?

 

Furthermore, while Coutinho clearly wanted to leave, would he
really have downed tools and refused to play in this, a World Cup year?
He submitted a transfer request last summer yet still contributed 12
goals and nine assists during the first half of the 2017-18 campaign?
Would he really have gone on strike again had he been told his dream
move to Barca would only be allowed to go through this summer?

 

Of course, Liverpool’s frustration at losing Coutinho has been
offset by the belated arrival of Virgil van Dijk from Southampton, and
the Dutch defender should undoubtedly strengthen the Merseysiders’
brittle back four. 

 

However, when it comes to evaluating a team’s transfer window, one
must ask oneself if the squad is stronger or weaker than it was at the
beginning of the month?

 

Liverpool are weaker. They were dealt all the aces but ended up splitting the pot.

 

The centre of defence has been improved but it remains reliant on
two of the worst goalkeepers in the Premier League. Indeed, Lorius
Karius has now been promoted to first-choice, a staggering decision
given that he has the worst save percentage (44.44) of any goalkeeper to
have played at least five games across all of Europe’s Big Five
leagues.

 

Given Roma were clearly desperate for money in January, Liverpool
really should have pushed to sign their current No.1, the excellent
Alisson. 

 

Furthermore, Daniel Sturridge’s loan move to West Bromwich Albion
means that Liverpool are an injury to Roberto Firmino away from having
to turn to Danny Ings or Dominic Solanke – no goals this season – to
lead an attack now shorn of the versatile Coutinho.

 

The pressure on Mohamed Salah, Firmino and Sadio Mane to continue
carrying this top-heavy team through the remainder of the season has
just got a whole lot heavier.

 

David Luiz

 

#5 Loser: David Luiz

 

Roy Keane aside, no player would wish harm befall a fellow
professional – but David Luiz could perhaps be forgiven for hoping that
the injury suffered by Chelsea team-mate Andreas Christensen offers him a
shot at some regular game time.

 

Blues boss Antonio Conte has repeatedly insisted that a persistent
knee problem is the sole reason why the Brazilian has not started a
Premier League game since October but it is clear that Luiz has slipped
down the pecking order at Stamford Bridge, in spite of the fact that he
was one of the key men in last season’s title triumph. 

 

Despite claims to the contrary, it is well known that relations
between the two have become increasingly strained, so Luiz would have
welcomed rumours that he might have been a part of the deal that saw
Chelsea sign Olivier Giroud from Arsenal. 

 

The 30-year-old has not been called up by Brazil since June and if
he is to have any chance of making Tite’s squad for Russia 2018, he
needs be playing on a weekly basis between now and the end of the
season. 

 

The sad reality is that even if he overcomes his nagging knee
injury, there is little chance of that happening now that the window has
closed and he is still at Chelsea. Luiz will, therefore, be awaiting
Christensen’s medical report with even more interest than the Dane
himself!

 

Eric Hall

 

#6 Loser: The game

 

The infamous agent Eric Hall once quipped, “The worst thing about my job is that the player gets a 90 per cent cut of my earnings.” How the flamboyant, cigar-smoking Londoner must wish he was still in the business! 

 

Indeed, Fernando Felicevich pocketed £15m from the swap deal that
saw his client, Alexis Sanchez, move to Manchester United from Arsenal,
and Henrikh Mkhitaryan go in the opposite direction. It was also
reported that the latter’s representative, Mino Raiola, held up the deal
as he haggled over his share of the spoils.

 

Raiola, of course, is the man who made approximately £24m on Paul
Pogba’s transfer to United in the summer of 2016, which really made
people sit up and take notice of just how much money is going out of the
game and into the hands of agents. 

 

Earlier this month, UEFA’s Professional Football Strategy Group
revealed that a study of some 2,000 transfers between 2014 and 2017
revealed that agents were effectively operating without any restraints
in terms of their commissions. 

 

The average overall share of 12.6 per cent was disturbing enough
but some agents were claiming as much as half of the transfer fee
involved. Worse still, the study found that the smaller the dealer, the
more money the agents were making, meaning that while the rich clubs are
being fleeced, it is the smaller teams that are suffering the most. 

 

Agents have a necessary job to do. Nobody would dispute that.
Players must be protected. They need financial advice. But the bottom
line is that football is losing hundreds of millions of pounds every
year to a group of people that have a vested interested in the game and
nothing more.

Leave a Reply